If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
I just edited the confusing posts of #1 #2 & #3 by adding correct references.
But #1 is still a duplicate listing because of the problems with KM and Albertine Thalers which is mixing those two types up.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Done too. Owner is the same on both pages, he just created page twice I guess
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Hello.
Hey. Usually for different metals should create different pages. The question is, was there really two versions of this coin in 2011? I would suggest the referee check it out.
Thank you.
Quote: "Cyrillius"Hello.
Hey. Usually for different metals should create different pages. The question is, was there really two versions of this coin in 2011? I would suggest the referee check it out.
Thank you.
Hey Cyrillius,
Yes, I agree. I spoke to one of my friends that owns a coin shop on the Falklands and he said that there was only nickel plated steel produced in 2011 but they used the same reverse die as 2004.
When the referee checks it out, I guess we will end up with one page for the 2004 and one for the 2011
According to Word coin News, There are two different material for 5 Pence 2011.
I get a non magnetic 5 Pence from 2011 and I have no doubt that the magnetic version has been issued too.
[edit] Few collectors confirmed to me this night that their coin version is actually magnetic.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Sapientiae plerumque stultitia est comes.
Si c'est un grand plaisir d'être reconnu par ses amis, c'est peut-être encore plus flatteur d'être reconnu par ses adversaires.
Be yourself; everyone else is already taken.
Quote: "Frenchlover"According to Word coin News, There are two different material for 5 Pence 2011.
I get a non magnetic 5 Pence from 2011 and I have no doubt that the magnetic version has been issued too.
[edit] Few collectors confirmed to me this night that their coin version is actually magnetic.
I can confirm this.
I have both versions: 2011 magnetic and 2011 non-magnetic.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Good morning all, please accept my apologies but I appear to have validated a new page request when there was already an exsiting page for this particular coin in the catalogue:
These are duplicate listings. I am the creator of both pages
I don't remember listing it the first time and somehow it found it's way into the stack to be added. It is much more of a presentation type "Medal" is the reason I listed it under medals in Exonumia the second time, but it can go either way as there are no clear definitions as to what is a medal and what is a souvenir token. Each listing only has one member that possess the piece, which is me both times so no need add it to the surviving page.
I'm not sure, but I believe the two numbers reference minor varieties (presence of Sherritt Mint privy mark?) The two I reported were new pages without photos. I know TokenCatalog.com has got some duplicate listings.
Titus
Numista referee for banknotes from Canada, USA, Costa Rica, China, Macau, Singapore, & Taiwan.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
If you like coins, medals and tokens with ship motives follow my new instagram account with regular updates @numisnautiker
From time to time I sell some coins on Ebay make sure to follow me @apuking on Ebay.
Derf: there are comments on the pages.
"NOTE: There are 2 different finishes for this coin, brilliant copper and antique patina (this coin), for some reason, on Krause catalog is listed ONLY antique patina version, as KM 907, but not the other one."
Still a different 'finish' is not another type. So I would still merge them, maybe keep the picture in the comment field even if I could not tell any brilliance on that one coins pictures.
Quote: "Idolenz"Still a different 'finish' is not another type. So I would still merge them, maybe keep the picture in the comment field even if I could not tell any brilliance on that one coins pictures.
But doesn't that fall in line with the frosted proof vs proof .. ?? They are separated .. ?
? Format Format Format ? ?
Do not argue with ignorant people .. !! They will drag you down to their level, then pulverize you with experience ...
Quote: "Idolenz"Still a different 'finish' is not another type. So I would still merge them, maybe keep the picture in the comment field even if I could not tell any brilliance on that one coins pictures.
I would suggest contacting the referee with this question.