Proofreading of Libyan modern 20 dinars is required [solved]

It looks strange  at the moment  that the modern 20 dinars of Libya no date (2016) is described in two articles. 

It may be a nightmare for a collector to pick up the correct place to search  for swap and to tick a one in own collection.

 

You've been around long enough to know if you request a change to coin/banknote/exonumia page(s) then you have to actually state exactly which pages you are referring to. Why play these games?

N#205131

N#223181

ND (2016) P# 83 is listed on both pages.

Now we have the required information, it does seem that P#83 needs moving to N#223181, leaving only P#79 in N#205131. The chief differences are the presence of a hologram on the obverse of P#79 and the removal of the lower part of the building on the obverse of P#83.

There are many more differences between standard Pick#79 and Pick#83. The easiest way to distinguish is given in the article about 2013 issue: vertical or horizontal style of the right serial number.
The point is obvious: there should be 2 articles about the issue, but the position of them is very dubious: does really Numista wishes to continue spread hate between nations as it already does persistently ( see  the discussion of persecution of Muslim states in topic https://en.numista.com/forum/topic51669.html) by dividing the territory of Libya into parts, or indeed locals at Tripoli refuse to accept 20 dinars of Pick#83, for it is issued for alien territory though still in Libya, so the division was made already.

Fixed.

I will not comment on nonsense.

Yes, now we have two articles. 

One is for Lybia. 

Another one is for its part. 

So Numista indeed decided to spread hate between peoples of Libya!

It is not likely for the circulation: the population of both parts accept the both emissions, especially illiterate peoples. But it is very pleasurable for the personal opinion of His Majesty.

Is it possible to return to reality and leave this nonsense to a mind of a person, not the Numista policy?