» Quick access to the last post
Quote: "harryg"To me, some of the details are off. Did you measure it and do some silver tests, etc? Weight is off by 1.5g too.the weight is right as in catalog and i made magnetic test and its ok
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78040.html
Quote: "Ecapoe"Hello,thanks you soo much you really help me ..
Trouble with weight is its variability.
I just searched and found:
4 thalers 1704. Range 28 to 28.6
1 for 1703. 28.4
1 for 1702. 28.5
Average 28.4 so I think our information is off. I correct it on this basis.
The 1703 has 4 rings on the arm, as mentionned by Herinek in his catalogue. So good for your coin.
Here it is. Looks like yours: http://www.lanzauctions.com/coin.php?b=0JwGIaEWaMpdbemVg4LvBMF%2FMt5%2Bis%2BMBXz%2B51smxZ0%3D&a=e%2BFWZOuR9hIXRbwxT7m3cng%2Ftgg4kG8%2BLCeiW85gAAU%3D%23n1
Looks ok but, I would not risk an opinion on genuity based on a picture. Try much better quality pics that could be enlarged to see details. But most people will say that without the coin at hand, it is difficult.
Quote: "Ryurazu"i would say no and this coin would be suss to me especially due to the rim, with copies the rim are a detail that counterfeiter take no attention to if they are just trying to fake bullion coins.Consider that your opinion is to confirm the authentic piece?
Quote: "Sody2005"What your opinion depends on when you say fake?

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 02:57.