Error in the data - part 3

11 posts

» Quick access to the last post

  Just creating a newer version of the other two error Topics, as they were getting long.
So any errors can be put in here - or create your own Topic of course!
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9700.html
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces32222.html

  The first entry has Rarity Index of 77 and the second is 93
To me they look the same coin, and have the same KM# 31 number.
Should the second entry be deleted?
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
Well I think that one of them used to be a silver pound.

So that's why it's got a high number.
Kenny

- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.

Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
  Something like KM# 31a (I guess).
But then both nowadays say copper-nickel. And I also guess the second coin has lower Rarity as it is a more recent creation (pieces 9700 v 32222) - so most members had already added first one to collections.
  It don't matter to me - just pointing it out - and surely whoever created that second entry would have got the red 'warning' that KM# 31 already existed, and clicked on 'create anyway'.  8.  :)
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
both are the same - in english and french parts. I am an ass that I actually marked the new one
verified without recognizing that it already existed.  z|
There's no difference and no need to have both. I will merge them to the better image version.
beat me up if I mess things up but I think this is neccessary now.
 What is the name of the currency for Macedonia - is it denar or denra ?
This is from the page and shows both ...

Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
Yes, It's error and should be corrected. Correct is "100 Deni = 1 Denar".

And "Denari" in plural.


Borut
 
Tanzania - Shilling (1966-date)

100 senti = shilling

Should that read   100 senti = 1 shilling
Token collector [1600-1899] with some coins
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces12049.html
could someone check his coins for the edge? My 2009 Mumbai coin has a standard milled edge, the picture looks like taken from a thicker older coin (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1608.html)
Quote: androlhttps://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces12049.html
could someone check his coins for the edge? My 2009 Mumbai coin has a standard milled edge, the picture looks like taken from a thicker older coin (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1608.html)
You're right, this coin has a standard milled edge. I tried to get rid of the picture in a change request before, but I assume the editors felt uncomfortable with it? I reentered the change request just now. (anyone can submit change requests, just go to the coin page, click the "Modify or add data about this coin" link at the bottom of the page and proceed)

By the way, I have three items of this coin, and not two are the same. On one of them, the number "5" is considerably wider than on the other two. The other two are different with respect to the central lion of the Ashoka column: on one coin it has pointed ears, on the other it doesn't. I'll see if I can add scans some time.
Here are the scans I promised. For the reverse, I cut out the two "5"-s and pasted them next to eachother to show the difference in size. For the obverse, I encircled the lions' heads: two have a block-head, one has ears!

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 16:37.