hi,
please modify year list and comments on Timor countermarked coins km#8 (https://en.numista.com/catalogue/contributions/modifier.php?id=35300)
correct year list:
Year Comment
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1890
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1890MM
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1891
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1892
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1893
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1894
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1895
ND (1900) km#8.1 countermarked on Mexico Chihuahua 8 Reales #377.2 - host date 1896
ND (1900) km#8.2 countermarked on Mexico Guanajuato 8 Reales #377.8 - host date 1894 RS
ND (1900) km#8.3 countermarked on Mexico San Luis Potosi 8 Reales #377.12 - host date 1886 LC
in according with data on Krause Catalogue 1801-1900 (2015 - 8th edition)
Thanks
Year list and reference on Timor's Countermarked coniage [solved]
3 posts
This message aims at: requesting the modification of a coin in the catalogue
Status: DoneUpvotes: 1
Downvotes: 0
Sulfur
Catalogue referee
Joined: 11 Jun 2016
Posts: 3790
Posts: 3790
Posted: 31 Aug 2019, 02:53
#
Edited: 31 Aug 2019, 02:57
Edited: 31 Aug 2019, 02:57
Posted:
#
Edited:
Edited:
Hello! 
I submitted a request to change all years to ND (1900), with the host coin's date being found in the comments section of each year-line.
I left out any information about mints from the year-line comments, and instead kept all those in the page's overall comments section for one main reason: Krause has a weird format here.
My newest Krause of this era is from 2012, so yours may be more up-to-date, but from what I read, any Chihuahua dates with no marks are actually from Uncertain Mints, yet are still listed within Timor's KM#8.1. These seem to be the only confirmable mint marks:
1886:
1) San Luis Potosi (LC)
1890:
1) Chihuahua (MM)
1894:
1) Guanajuato (RS)
2) Guadalajara (JS)
When it came to countermarking these coins, I do not think the countermarkers paid attention to the mints--any mint mark is, more than likely, plausible. And with there being so many unknown mints, I think keeping that information in the comments section would make the page more... understandable.
I submitted a request to change all years to ND (1900), with the host coin's date being found in the comments section of each year-line.
I left out any information about mints from the year-line comments, and instead kept all those in the page's overall comments section for one main reason: Krause has a weird format here.
My newest Krause of this era is from 2012, so yours may be more up-to-date, but from what I read, any Chihuahua dates with no marks are actually from Uncertain Mints, yet are still listed within Timor's KM#8.1. These seem to be the only confirmable mint marks:
1886:
1) San Luis Potosi (LC)
1890:
1) Chihuahua (MM)
1894:
1) Guanajuato (RS)
2) Guadalajara (JS)
When it came to countermarking these coins, I do not think the countermarkers paid attention to the mints--any mint mark is, more than likely, plausible. And with there being so many unknown mints, I think keeping that information in the comments section would make the page more... understandable.
Status changed to Started
(Sulfur, 31 Aug 2019, 02:55)
Posted:
#
The page has been updated:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces35300.html.
I hope everything looks more proper now.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces35300.html.
I hope everything looks more proper now.
Status changed to Done
(Sulfur, 31 Aug 2019, 16:07)
Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 01:34.