PATTREN cOIN [solved]

16 posts

» Quick access to the last post

not the first question but I ask many times. I got $: 15 from selling this coin This coin buyer said. This coin is amazing...Is your analysis wrong..
about this coin
You are wrong about it, sorry..
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27398.html
In your case its worth 20$ , not a big loss ... :P
Quote: "VintageCoin"​You are wrong about it, sorry..
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27398.html
​In your case its worth 20$ , not a big loss ... :P
*sigh*
​First off @VintageCoin, that's the 2 Jiao (20 cents) coin you've linked to. This is the 1 Yuan's page:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3849.html

Secondly, selling your coin for $15 doesn't prove it's real. It just proves someone out there was willing to spend $15 on it. Not to mention that if it really were a pattern coin, $15 would be the bargain of the century. By the way, I hope that you've told the buyer about what has been said here regarding it's authenticity.

Finally, like all these people here have told you previously, this is not a pattern coin. Like I have said twice before, the presence of the character "造" for a coin dated Year 3 (1914) is impossible. Is this really so hard to accept? No offence, but this is the third or fourth time you have asked the same thing.
Quote: "CassTaylor"
Quote: "VintageCoin"​You are wrong about it, sorry..
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27398.html
​​In your case its worth 20$ , not a big loss ... :P
​*sigh*
​​First off @VintageCoin, that's the 2 Jiao (20 cents) coin you've linked to. This is the 1 Yuan's page:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3849.html


​Yeah , i didnt looked the reverse carefuly, its different :D
Quote: "Mr-IQBAL001"​not the first question but I ask many times. I got $: 15 from selling this coin This coin buyer said. This coin is amazing...Is your analysis wrong..
​about this coin


​AAAAAAHHH !!!
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Lol Petrus! :D
Quote: "CassTaylor"
Quote: "VintageCoin"​You are wrong about it, sorry..
​​https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces27398.html
​​In your case its worth 20$ , not a big loss ... :P
​*sigh*
​​First off @VintageCoin, that's the 2 Jiao (20 cents) coin you've linked to. This is the 1 Yuan's page:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3849.html

​Secondly, selling your coin for $15 doesn't prove it's real. It just proves someone out there was willing to spend $15 on it. Not to mention that if it really were a pattern coin, $15 would be the bargain of the century. By the way, I hope that you've told the buyer about what has been said here regarding it's authenticity.

​Finally, like all these people here have told you previously, this is not a pattern coin. Like I have said twice before, the presence of the character "造" for a coin dated Year 3 (1914) is impossible. Is this really so hard to accept? No offence, but this is the third or fourth time you have asked the same thing.


I only have trouble thinking about it. . Buyers of coins, get a much higher price, than the price paid to me and in my opinion the catalog only provides data about what is known. as an example of a VOC Coin case. This catalog is not open about 1727 VOC Coins because they do not have a coin sample
Your opinion is fair enough, but I repeat my question; what exactly makes you so sure that you have a pattern that no catalogue anywhere knows about?

Let's review the facts; there is no evidence for the existence of a pattern coin like yours anywhere.....

....but there is plenty of evidence for the existence of fakes just like your coin, with the extra character appearing on a Fat Man coin dated before 1919.
Quote: "CassTaylor"​Your opinion is fair enough, but I repeat my question; what exactly makes you so sure that you have a pattern that no catalogue anywhere knows about?

​Let's review the facts; there is no evidence for the existence of a pattern coin like yours anywhere.....

​....but there is plenty of evidence for the existence of fakes just like your coin, with the extra character appearing on a Fat Man coin dated before 1919.
​maybe it's the initial idea "造"
Maybe the moon is made of cheese too, but there is no hard evidence to back that wild claim up.

Therefore you and I would naturally assume it is not, until proven otherwise with objective evidence.
Quote: "CassTaylor"Maybe the moon is made of cheese too, but there is no hard evidence to back that wild claim up.

​Therefore you and I would naturally assume it is not, until proven otherwise with objective evidence.


You are very good. Never tired of answering all my questions well. You are all fun
but now the coin has been offered $: 100
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"
Quote: "Mr-IQBAL001"​not the first question but I ask many times. I got $: 15 from selling this coin This coin buyer said. This coin is amazing...Is your analysis wrong..
​​about this coin
​​

​​AAAAAAHHH !!!
​Thank you for all
Status changed to Solved (Mr-IQBAL001, 20 Oct 2018, 10:18)
Status changed to Opened (Mr-IQBAL001, 20 Oct 2018, 10:35)
Status changed to Solved (Mr-IQBAL001, 20 Oct 2018, 10:37)

Fake, no such pattern, ignorant people like you are what ruin the hobby

I am more experienced in the field of ancient and chinese coins, south-east asian coins included too!

coincrze

Fake, no such pattern, ignorant people like you are what ruin the hobby

Not sure who you are talking to but no one is listening. But it's 6 years later and they're all gone.

fjjohnson

coincrze

Fake, no such pattern, ignorant people like you are what ruin the hobby

Not sure who you are talking to but no one is listening. But it's 6 years later and they're all gone.

revisit to an old post, small chance they’re still here

I am more experienced in the field of ancient and chinese coins, south-east asian coins included too!

coincrze

Fake, no such pattern, ignorant people like you are what ruin the hobby

That's right, scold them, they deserve nothing else.

Just please - orientation in time and space! But taking a break always helps.

Ivan

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 06:50.