Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 16:14
#
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 16:14
#
I'm just interested to know why every precious metal coin is listed a certain way example Silver(.999) but with the US war nickels that have a silver makeup of silver (.350) the referee insist on keeping listed as copper silver and manganese shouldn't he follow suit with the rest of the catalog so that it will count for our silver weight?
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces45.html
I would appreciate if a admin can get him to fix this since he continues to deny my request?
Matt
CassTaylor
Closed account
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 18:42
#
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 18:42
#
@Matt
I'm absolutely agreed with you. Did the referee give any reason for the rejection?
Idolenz
Catalogue referee
Joined: 13 Jul 2013
Posts: 9579
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 20:45
#
Posted: 24 Jun 2018, 20:45
#
You could make it like for this sorry excuse of a "silver" coin
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3550.html
but I don't know when Numista stops counting silver ... could be 30%
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 01:49
#
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 01:49
#
Quote: "CassTaylor" @Matt
I'm absolutely agreed with you. Did the referee give any reason for the rejection?He rejected it and all he said was sorry but current value is correct. Ok I'm sure that is the makeup but if that's the case then I guess we should redo the entire catalog. I've seen tons of coins listed the proper way with less than 35% silver so I don't think there is a minimum.
Matt
CassTaylor
Closed account
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 07:38
#
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 07:38
#
I think Idolenz was referring to the point on a fineness scale when a Numista page stops showing "silver bullion value" at the bottom of a page.
But yeah, I'd definitely agree with listing it your way.
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 23:10
#
Posted: 25 Jun 2018, 23:10
#
I hope one of the catalog admins will take care of this since going through the referee on a power trip seems to be pointless.
Matt
cncote10
Catalogue referee
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 953
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 01:58
#
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 01:58
#
Matt you are right...since the Mexican Peso that is .300 and the other that is .100 are listed that way there must be no rule against it and the Wartime Nickel should be .350. On any website that shows melt values, you can get the nickel one too so the silver value should be here too I would imagine.
Jarcek
Numista team
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 16166
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:35
#
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:35
#
It should really be Silver (.350)
I thought the limit was exactly 0.100 but I guess it is 0.101 actually.
Catalogue administrator
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:51
#
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:51
#
Quote: "Jarcek" It should really be Silver (.350)
I thought the limit was exactly 0.100 but I guess it is 0.101 actually.Can you make the adjustments for it since I have already tried and the referee shot me down saying it was correct already? Also maybe shoot him a message and let him know that he was not correct.
Matt
Jarcek
Numista team
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 16166
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:53
#
Posted: 26 Jun 2018, 18:53
#
I will be home tommorow evening, so I will check then and make request.
Catalogue administrator
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 16:02
#
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 16:02
#
Submitted again and turned down again! I guess I'll just keep on doing it until he gets it.
Matt
neilithicman
Joined: 22 Nov 2017
Posts: 1134
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 23:15
#
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 23:15
#
This is the problem with letting the referees run their country how they want, there's no consistency across the catalogue.
What? Me Worry
CassTaylor
Closed account
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 23:23
#
Posted: 27 Jun 2018, 23:23
#
Quote: "neilithicman" This is the problem with letting the referees run their country how they want, there's no consistency across the catalogue.Hear Hear!
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 00:45
#
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 00:45
#
Quote: "neilithicman" This is the problem with letting the referees run their country how they want, there's no consistency across the catalogue.I second that 100%..... maybe if more than just I send change request to him for it he will get the idea.
Matt
Cycnos
Joined: 22 Apr 2017
Posts: 3089
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 04:54
#
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 04:54
#
Did you send a personnal message to the referee to explain your opinion ? If so, link this trade to him.
Jarcek
Numista team
Joined: 22 Dec 2014
Posts: 16166
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 17:40
#
Posted: 28 Jun 2018, 17:40
#
Sent request as well. Are there more coins done this way in US catalogue?
Catalogue administrator
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 4 Jul 2018, 05:03
#
Posted: 4 Jul 2018, 05:03
#
Still hasn't been corrected maybe if he's not active he should be replaced?
Matt
Tovarich
Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Posts: 877
Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 05:37
#
Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 05:37
#
Did we give up on this?
Myeackle
Joined: 25 Jun 2014
Posts: 1557
Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 19:16
#
Posted: 20 Jul 2018, 19:16
#
I still have pending request but looks like the admin don't care to fix it?
Matt
Tovarich
Joined: 9 Aug 2015
Posts: 877
Posted: 21 Jul 2018, 01:49
#
Posted: 21 Jul 2018, 01:49
#
It seems someone accepted the change now.
Used time zone is UTC+2:00. Current time is 05:50.