1/24 thaler Cristina (16)48

5 posts
Please can tell someone where the difference is between these:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces78794.html
and this
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces77628.html
The legend on the pictures puzzles me. They look the same

thanks
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
I see the headings are different - other than that NaDa

years 1644-1649


years 1647-1648
Those who believe they can do something and those who believe they can't are both right.
- Henry Ford
Normally they look a bit the same, however I think the image of the coin under the occupation of Riga isn't the good one here : the legend for Riga is "MON : NOVA CIVIT · RIGE".

http://ccoins.ru/pages/riga_city_en.html
Quote: "Cycnos"​Normaly they look a bit the same, however I thing the image of the coin under the occupation of Riga isn't the good one here : the legend for Riga is "MON : NOVA CIVIT · RIGE".

http://ccoins.ru/pages/riga_city_en.html
​Indeed both entries say 'LIVONI', the KM#31 should be CIVI(T) RIGE
Non est totum quod splendet ut aurum
Rijkdom bestaat niet uit het hebben van veel bezittingen, maar in het hebben van weinig behoeften
Quote: "PetrusAscanus"
Quote: "Cycnos"​Normaly they look a bit the same, however I thing the image of the coin under the occupation of Riga isn't the good one here : the legend for Riga is "MON : NOVA CIVIT · RIGE".
​​
​​http://ccoins.ru/pages/riga_city_en.html
​​Indeed both entries say 'LINVONI', the KM#31 should be CIVI(T) RIGE

Maybe change the heading also to reflect that​
Those who believe they can do something and those who believe they can't are both right.
- Henry Ford

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 08:13.