I thought these were one-year-only issues, for 2006, so how can there be also a proof issue for 2007 ?
Maybe there was, but can someone check - and delete if there was not (leaving just the circulation 2006 and proof 2006 entries) - for both coins. Thanks
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19263.html
Signature D'Après O. Roty
Why dates 1991 to 2001 as 1979 1980 1981 1983 exist ?
Meaning why does that KM number make it a different
coin, as D'Après is also on coins before 1991 (I have some).
And similarly, an example, is this one below ...
Can someone check that KM#7 should be 25.55mm (and not 30.85mm) for a
Jersey 1/24th Shilling, as I don't want to change the page if I have something else.
That is all from my list, over a few months. There are a lot of others that I added
on the new amendments system. Those above are what is left. Thanks - and hopefully
other members will add their requests on here as well, for reasons mentioned at the top
1. added Hejaz and Nejd to the first coin you mentioned, was missing.
however: according to catalogs it was already using the later called saudi arabia riyal currency instead of dinar from KM#4 on (regular coinage). No need to change to Hejaz and Nejd Dinar I think - but not so sure.
2. in fact WC catalogs have sorted like this:
- Hejaz and Nejd (Kingdom and Sultanate)
Transitional Coinage (KM#1 / 2 / A3)
Regular Coinage (KM#4 - 6)
Hejaz and Nejd Sultanate
Regular Coinage (KM#7 - 15)
- United Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Regular Coinage (KM#16 - 42) KM#43 missing in list, including countermarked coinage
Reform Coinage (KM#44 - to date) from 1963 on Halala, Ghirsh, Riyal
Those 1344 issues are listed as Hejaz and Nejd, not Hejez only. So - who's wrong? Maybe the catalog,
but I am not sure - so they stay like this.
3. About the Yugoslavian coins: not easy to explain why. fact is - the currency reform to "hard dinar"
took place on January 1st, 1966. however, coins of the new currency got struck earlier and bear the date
1965 also. it is not an error of Numista's currency selection (which happens sometimes - sorry). rather
was Yugoslavian policy to strike coins earlier than using them it seems.
4. Angolan 5 Kwanza: you discovered an error here that comes when coins do not have a date letters but show a commemorated event that is mistaken for a date thanks for this.
it is of course a 1977 issue! the 1975 in the lettering is NOT the date! will make a note in the coin sheet right now.
Quote: Makake77@Magus: added. so all - even the "W" issues - are burnished uncirculated? not Proof for "W"?
No, not proof. Platinum Eagle proofs have a different reverse design each year. All others, including the burnished uncirculated, have regular flying bald eagle reverse.
ok - replaced them. however, nestor added a coin under "octagonal" and added his "seemingly" round
image of the coin. it does not change Nestor's or Splash40's collection - however - it might be some
kind of optical trick
All three are 1953 coins from Madagascar. Each page just has regular mintage figures, but there were also ESSAI (trial) pieces issued. It says on the modification sheet amendments to the year to be asked for on the Forum. So please add ESSAI Mintage 1,200 for each coin as a second line.
Quote: ZacUKhttps://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19263.html
Signature D'Après O. Roty
Why dates 1991 to 2001 as 1979 1980 1981 1983 exist ?
Meaning why does that KM number make it a different
coin, as D'Après is also on coins before 1991 (I have some).
And similarly, an example, is this one below ...
that's right, all these Franc coins have two different designs, normal design for circulation with "O. Roty" and special design with "D'AP O. ROTY".
But not 2 Francs, this has "D'APRÈS O. ROTY" on all coins. I don't find any other difference. These two are the same coins.
My fault I guess for opening a new Topic with six parts - one opener then five replies in a row straight away. Did not want to make one long opener. I see the last two parts have been answered - so thanks for them, and wonder has anyone seen the first four parts? Most if not all could not be done in the modification pages that now exist; some I was not sure of so did not want to change without someone checking first. Thanks
the moderator wants to play games and thinks I could do it on my own. I cannot edit the year field, it's grey.
QuoteRequest state: Rejected
Reason: You can do it yourself! Just rewrite 1987 to 1407. Then I'll accept your calendar request.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces16923.html
I entered the comments for the years. Two lines were validated, one rejected and is now without the word "year" which appears at the other two years. I repeated the request for that line to make the three lines look systematical and it is rejected again, with some comment
QuoteThe year can be rewritten as 5726. Then select the calendar Hebrew and edit the comment, leaving it only as the Hebrew script.
so why doesn't he just do it?
Am I making requests to correct the catalogue or am I to execute requests of the moderators?
by the way, it's tricky to write such comments
test: "Latin (Hebrew)"
5741 (תש מ״א)
and then:
5741 (תש מ״א)
5741 (תש מ״א)
(these three lines are all exactly the same text)
Test: "Hebrew (Latin)"
תש מ״א (5741)
תש מ״א (5741)
(doesn't work in any way)
test with "left-to-rigt-mark" after Hebrew year:
תש מ״א (5741)
תש מ״א (5741)
works!
Quotehttps://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces11962.html
this coin is from 1941, it needs a different currency, HRK is not correct, HRK was introduced in 1992
1# done this - added a new currency
2# added the two A/B varieties - totally wrong? hmmm....
3# don't know - it's from the catalogs. I am not venezolean, anyone here to show the difference?
The only thing I found out: different mints.
Quote: Makake77https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9489.html
what's the difference between the two lines
1989 Y#43a.2 (large letters, no lines) ?
3# don't know - it's from the catalogs. I am not venezolean, anyone here to show the difference?
The only thing I found out: different mints.
The year needs amending - I think!
As the coin was only issued in 1989 and 1990 and there are three entries in the Year list for 1989 and only one for 1990 then I think either line two or three needs the Year changed from 1989 to 1990. That would give two entries then for each year (so one each of Y# 43a.1 and Y# 43a.2 per year). I guess that line three would be the one to change, as line four says Caracas Mint like line three does.
I made an image below of what I suggest ...
QuoteY# 43a.1 2 BOLIVARES
7.5000 g., Nickel Clad Steel, 27 mm. Obv: Small letters in
legend, raised motto in ribbon, lines beneath horse, “R” in
'Libertador' 2mm away from truncation Rev: Head of Bolivar left,
small letters
Date Mintage F VF XF Unc BU
1989(sc) 200,000,000 — — 0.20 0.75 1.50
1990(c) 400,000,000 — — 0.20 0.75 1.50
Note: Two varieties of 1990 exist
Y# 43a.2 2 BOLIVARES
7.5000 g., Nickel Clad Steel, 27 mm. Obv: Large letters in
legend, no lines beneath horse, “R” in 'Libertador' touching
truncation Rev: Head of Bolivar left, large letters
Date Mintage F VF XF Unc BU
1989(w) 100,000,000 — — 0.20 0.75 1.50
1989(c) 95,000,000 — — 0.20 0.75 1.50
I don't know about the differences in 1989, however the (c) stands for Caracas Mint,
(w) for Werdohl Metalworks (Germany), and (sc) for Schwerte Metalworks (Germany)
And: I don't know about the differences in the mentioned "two varieties" for 1990...
Interesting to see that Schön & Schön catalog (a german one) has different data present, yet similar in a way:
it says
1) Royal Canadian Mint "Type Barre" 1989,1990
2) VDM (Vereinigte Deutsche Metallwerke Altona AG) "Type Barre" 1989
2) VDM (Vereinigte Deutsche Metallwerke Altona AG) "Type d'après Barre" 1989
VDM (translated "United German Metalworks", seated in Altona) might have metal processing plants
in Schwerte and Werdohl, hence the WC catalogs remark about those mint locations
yeah ok - created these. thanks.
I would suggest checking now collections' coins for your varieties - since this was severely messed
up by Krause it seems. Another case of collection transfer mess for some of us
I have an 1886 Belgium 2 Centimes KM# 35
The above page says 1869-1909 but has only ten different years. Also it skips from 1876 to 1902 so surely there were other years in between i.e. 1886 as well? Not sure, so if someone has a catalogue and can confirm it was issued, then it can be included, as I am wishing to add it to my exchanges.
Thanks
Cancel that - I was going to add a close up picture, and though the date is worn, perhaps it is 1836
Though now on the correct page (KM# 4) there are a few years with just one or two million mintage, but the 1836 reads 'KM#4.2 (narrow rims) overdate variety exists; rare' but how can 27 million be rare? Unless it refers to the overdate - in which case should that then have it's own line? So assuming it was from the previous year then the overdate is 1835/6 perhaps; then rare can be put to that line.
May as well add the pictures after all ...
according to catalogs KM#35 really stops at 1876 and commences at early 20th century.
the second one, KM#4 - you assumed the right - that "rare" remark corresponds with the overdate variety.
I hestitate to give an own line - so I removed the comment as for you proposal.
The Notebook reads 1412-1431 (1431-2009) which the error is caused in the Year list, as the first line just reads 1431 instead of having the western equivalent date in brackets afterwards.
merged the two 1430 entries.
as for the second issue: contacted the user to check his coin and enter it into a given date.
I will delete the "unknown" entry afterwards
As if there were not enough (nine already) versions of 1861 penny on that page, could a tenth be added? I ask first rather than adding it myself, to see if there is a KM number or if it is mentioned in catalogues. I refer to my photo where the lower coin has the standard date, and the top coin has a wider date.
hmm- I don't see much of a difference. but I will add it if you could give me more information
where to add it - I mean, under what KM#x.y with what variety?
there are several varieties for 1861 issues listed.
Just as there are three entries for 1950, there should be three for 1951 please.
There is a circulation issue of 120,000 to be added, to the existing two entries.
as for the 5 pesetas coin - they are different entries. the one is the spanish issue, the other one for
the azores. I transferred the entries to it, so that both coins should exist in the database
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces19263.html
Signature D'Après O. Roty
Why dates 1991 to 2001 as 1979 1980 1981 1983 exist ?
Meaning why does that KM number make it a different
coin, as D'Après is also on coins before 1991 (I have some).
And similarly, an example, is this one below ...
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3796.html
Can someone check that KM#7 should be 25.55mm (and not 30.85mm) for a
Jersey 1/24th Shilling, as I don't want to change the page if I have something else.
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces3377.html
As if there were not enough (nine already) versions of 1861 penny on that page, could a tenth be added? I ask first rather than adding it myself, to see if there is a KM number or if it is mentioned in catalogues. I refer to my photo - the lower coin has the standard date, and the top coin has a wider date.
That is all; some of the others have since been amended. As mentioned above I guess it is my fault for pointing out too many errors - all at once. Which maybe is how they got missed. Thanks
thanks for this.
