kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 11:02
#
Posted: 5 Jun 2013, 11:02
#
Any coin that has two dates on it and commemorates something is classified as No Date!!!
Now stop rejecting my changes.
Example:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2695.html
Not No Date :
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces6439.html
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
imreh
Joined: 4 May 2012
Posts: 2526
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:39
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:39
#
I think it is very stupid, kommodore.
ND shall be applied ONLY to coins, where we really don't know the date , e.g. medieval or ancient coins.
If a coin is certainly minted in 1977, then it is 1977 regardless that the date is written on the coin or not.
kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:43
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:43
#
Yes, tell that to Krause catalogue.
The date is showed (xxxx) when you put no date.
I had my requests approved so I am right.
imreh
Joined: 4 May 2012
Posts: 2526
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:54
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 15:54
#
kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 16:24
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 16:24
#
Yes that's why the catalog is a reference in numismatics.
KennyG
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5285
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:02
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:02
#
I have to disagree, kommodore. I'm sorry.
There are times when commemorative issues have a commemorating date on the coin, but it is not the same as the date of issue. That is why we use "No date" instead of the date on the coin.
Because of school (one more week left, sweetmama), I haven't taken a look at the request list, but I would leave a message if I rejected a request that wasn't obvious to reject.
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.
Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:04
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:04
#
Quote: SmartOneKg There are times when commemorative issues have a commemorating date on the coin, but it is not the same as the date of issue. That is why we use "No date" instead of the date on the coin.That's what I said.
KennyG
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5285
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:17
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:17
#
By the way your Japanese is wrong on your signature.
I'll take a look at the requests when I get home. From here, I can just help out on the forum only.
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.
Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:18
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:18
#
Could you correct it for me please?
KennyG
Joined: 25 Apr 2010
Posts: 5285
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:21
#
Posted: 6 Jun 2013, 23:21
#
Watakushi no risuto kara kouka wo urimasu.
私のリストから硬貨を売ります。
EDIT: If you write Romaaji to someone who speaks Japanese, it would be silly.
Kenny
- Verifying your Asian and British-territorial coins everyday with the best quality photos and the best information.
Check out my Facebook, Kenneth Gucyski.
kommodore
Joined: 5 Nov 2009
Posts: 3010
Posted: 11 Jun 2013, 01:23
#
Posted: 11 Jun 2013, 01:23
#
I had my request rejected for this coin:
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces9366.html
It says the date is on the coin..but it has 2 years....judging by this, it means that this coin
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces2695.html is made in 1977
but it's not .
That's why we need to put no date on coins with 2 dates!
Used time zone is UTC+2:00. Current time is 11:37.