I think it would be a great idea to add an entirely new section solely for mules and errors on numista rather than having them for circulating coins. Not only is it more organize this way, but it also makes it easier to look for mules in one single spot. The website has: Circulating commemoratives, proto coins, patterns, local coins, etc. So why not have mules/errors? Seems like a reasonable addition. 👍
It’s just that I feel it’s quite misleading to say a mule is a “Standard Circulating Coin”. You can always link the mule variant of the coin in the description
It’s just that I feel it’s quite misleading to say a mule is a “Standard Circulating Coin”. You can always link the mule variant of the coin in the description
Why? When they were minted they were intended for circulation and many did.
I‘m not sure that they were intended. They are considered to be mistakes by the mint; a variant not meant to be. Therefore, it would be strange to label it as standard circulating coins.
“Instances of this in the latter half of the 19th century were the product of questionable Mint employee practices to profit from the sale of such coins to outside collectors.”
(I've seen other reports of this over the years, but this article was the first I found in a search.)
Oh yeah! That works! I like the organization. I just want the list of standard circulating coins to be more organized as a checklist for collection. Having some coins not have a checkmark because it’s a mule kind of feels off. Would it be okay if all mules were found in the description just like those other countries?
Oh yeah! That works! I like the organization. I just want the list of standard circulating coins to be more organized as a checklist for collection. Having some coins not have a checkmark because it’s a mule kind of feels off. Would it be okay if all mules were found in the description just like those other countries?