Sorting by reference numbers (bug)

2 posts • viewed 25 times

This message aims at: reporting a bug

Status: Opened
Upvotes: 2
Downvotes: 0

If this has already been reported just link it to the on being tracked, please.

 

Searching through Franklin Mint reference numbers I noticed that they are not sorting in the correct order. The silver is listed first in my example followed by the bronze. But the bronze is not in the correct order. Is this due to the format of the reference number? Should the composition be sorted separately under display for reference? Here is the search. My first attempt was to sort just SCI* but that was a bigger mess. (Silver did not get sorted first or together on this search)

 

Referee for Exonumia from United States

When I display your sort by reference it seems to be sorted by N#. Maybe the mechanism to sort based on a specified reference only applies for a clean use of the reference and not when wildcards are used.

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 18:45.