Possible variation - No dot after date (5 Kuna 2007)

Just found this in a pile of coins I collected from a friend this afternoon…

Edited 

Only the 1993 has NO DOT after the year! I checked my collection.

KM11 for all odd years have the inscription in Croatian

KM23 for all even years have the inscription in Latin

Maybe the dot on your 2007 coin is an after mint manipulation (erasing the dot)?

My collection

Sjoelund

Year without the dot km11 for all odd years. And inscription of the bear in Croatian.

That doesn't seem correct. The picture on the coin page for KM# 11 is inscription of the bear in Croatian but with a dot after 2001.

From SCWC!

Bizarre, I checked my collection and you're right. I should NOT have believed KM, I'll go back and edit. 

Sjoelund

 

I should NOT have believed KM

KM only mentions the difference in language of the inscription, no mentioning at all whether there is or isn't a dot after the date.

It's only the 1993, which has NO dot

Sjoelund

It's only the 1993, which has NO dot

 

 

Except the OP has a possible unknown variation for the 2007. So…variation….wear….filled die…?

Even the picture of two 2007's on the coin page has one with a pronounced dot and one with a very light dot so I'd suspect not a real variation.

N#2378

rsirian1

 

and one with a very light dot 

It's not that very light:

rsirian1

 … one with a pronounced dot and one with a very light dot … 

 Surely that refers to the coin on the right? 

Yes.

rsirian1

 

Yes.

Strange. You've literally said: “the picture on the coin page”, not the OP's picture.

rsirian1

 

Even the picture of two 2007's on the coin page has one with a pronounced dot and one with a very light dot

I missed your previous comment. I was referring to the picture on the coin page. My “Yes” to ZacUK's comment was because I thought he reposted the picture on the coin page. My mistake.

This one: