Duplicate

Keep

N#160314

Delete

N#133431

They are not the same. On the reverse of one of them is the mint mark and “ITALY” , and there is no mint mark or the word “ITALY” on the other one.

Not to mention different compositions.

I am not sure the presence of a mintmark deserve a page… i reviewed the composition before the request as the first one was marked simply “yellow metal”. They have the same obverse, reverse, diameter and weight.

cobrapel

I am not sure the presence of a mintmark deserve a page… i reviewed the composition before the request as the first one was marked simply “yellow metal”. They have the same obverse, reverse, diameter and weight.

I agree it does not deserve a separate page if only the mint mark was the difference. But it should not be deleted without acknowledging the variety without a mintmark. If they were completely identical one with a mint mark and one without, then add another line to one of the other pages and move the existing members to the no mint mark line would be an acceptable option. That is if they were exactly the same except for the mint mark. 

Did I miss something?  One is listed as aluminum bronze and the other as copper-nickel. 

Different compositions should have separate pages. Are we missing something here?

Bump before closing :-)