Split Belgium 500 francs N# 208674 ? [solved]

5 posts • viewed 73 times

This message aims at: requesting the modification of a banknote in the catalogue

Status: Done
Upvotes: 1
Downvotes: 1

N#208674
 

The comment in this note says that apart from the date there is no difference between P#103 and P#109. However, P#103 has signatures only at the front, while P#109 has signatures at the front and the back. Laurens Aernout also lists 2 types: LA#BFB-78 (P#103) and LA#BFB-79 (P#109).

You're absolutely right about the difference between these two KM#. The comments need changing to explain this. I wouldn't recommend splitting into two types but it's the kind of difference that is split elsewhere.

Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.

Change request has been entered. Thanks for the advice.

I would refer this to banknote master referees: @gyoschak and @Oklahoman whether it would be ok to split. Otherwise, there is nothing to be done in terms of admin intervention.

Catalogue administrator
Status changed to Started (Jarcek, 17 May 2024, 14:54)

I have always been of a mind that significant changes warrant their own listings.  Signatures being moved from the front to the back of a note would be a significant change in my mind.  I am guessing the wrinkle is that there is a note with the signatures on either side, and so the one side matches a variety of another year that has the signatures on one side?

 

In this case, I would have two listings, and I would link these two listings, but have them seperated by Pick number which is in effect, seperating by year.

 

Benjamin

Library Media Specialist, columnist, collector, and gardener...
Status changed to Done (Jarcek, 7 Oct 2024, 11:04)

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 23:19.