Add Krossen, City of

8 posts • viewed 44 times

This message aims at: requesting the creation or the modification of an issuer in the catalogue

Status: Rejected
Upvotes: 0
Downvotes: 0

Usable coin example here.

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/krosno_city-1.html

I will check if we need to add a more recent currency.

 

Edit - OK, a bit more complicated than I thought.

The catalog excerpt mentions Krossen passing to Brandenburg, but I see we have tended to keep all the coins together.  

Will discuss with others….

tdziemia

https://en.numista.com/catalogue/krosno_city-1.html

I will check if we need to add a more recent currency.

 

Edit - OK, a bit more complicated than I thought.

The catalog excerpt mentions Krossen passing to Brandenburg, but I see we have tended to keep all the coins together.  

Will discuss with others….

Oh, I didn't see that one. I guess a new issuer really doesn't make so much sense then. But the city belongs to a different state I believe? So something has to be different from the 15th-century coin. I don't want to open that barrel about the assignments of issuers to states/countries again 🤐

For now, submit the coin from the Marciniak auction in the current place for Krossen, City of, with the existing currency.

 

If you find the kipper type, then we need to add a later currency.

tdziemia

The coin from the Marciniak auction can go in the current place for Krossen, City of, with the existing currency.

 

If you find the kipper type, then we need to add a later currency.

??

 

That coin is the Kipper type.

Anyway, long story short: the issuer already exists and I missed it. I will add the coin to the existing issuer.

But please make “Krossen” searchable as well as an issuer and probably add another currency and this request can be rejected.

Trooper8

tdziemia

The coin from the Marciniak auction can go in the current place for Krossen, City of, with the existing currency.

 

If you find the kipper type, then we need to add a later currency.

??

 

That coin is the Kipper type.

Marciniak places it about 100 years earlier which seems more consistent with the hohlpfennig style, but what do I know?  (and they don;t give a catalog attribution … but they tend to know their stuff 😕

👍 I will close this one.

I see from the Kustrin example that indeed bracteate types were being struck in the kipper period, so please ignore my earlier comment (I should stop making assumptions like that).  

Status changed to Rejected (tdziemia, 26 Jan 2024, 14:52)

» Forum policy

Used time zone is UTC+2:00.
Current time is 14:43.