We already have NGO as country like Middle Earth, Atlantis, Esperantujo, Lunar republic, New France ect.
So why the others yes and this one no?
This coin items to be struck by a fictional place, you may not collect it but some collectors do and would not unders why it is behind USA instead f the correct fictional country.
I read quite quickly but apparently they do not state being fantasy country or micronation, but a non territorial NGO. Imo only geographical places (even fantasy ones) should be referenced as issuers; institutions like this one are supposed to go under Issuing entity
from your link: “The Regency of Lomar is fundamentally a small sovereign, non-territorial, non-profit, transnational diplomatic and humanitarian institution, or non-government organization (NGO)”. From my perspective, it defines an issuing entity.
Can you link me existing issuers having those same characteristics?
This could qualify as a micronation > "Werner Stiefel, an upstate New York pharmaceutical manufacturer, convinced a small gang of eager young libertarians to help him build a ferro-cement boat called "Atlantis II" in 1969. This vessel was supposed to sail down to the Caribbean, where the crew might grab some land in disputed territories such as Anguilla or the Silver Shoals near Haiti, or just use the ship as a staging ground to build some artificial concrete land…"
Exonumia collection ares not what you are used to deal in coins or banknotes.
It would be an error to try to enforce a coins logic into Exonumia as peaple are used to collect Micronation not depending on if they have territories or not but based on their flag and quote of arm.
Using this method we should have no Fantasy place like middle earth.
Exonumia collection ares not what you are used to deal in coins or banknotes.
It would be an error to try to enforce a coins logic into Exonumia as peaple are used to collect Micronation not depending on if they have territories or not but based on their flag and quote of arm.
Using this method we should have no Fantasy place like middle earth.
Not at all: Middle Earth is a place with "territory", even fictional.
A NGO or any worldwide association should not have an issuer. We should sort them under their main location probably? Like for numista: N#108211
Numisma.ru should be Russia probably. Universal League (Esperantists) should be Netherlands
Any news on why this Micronation was rejected when others were accepted?
What is the rule, it look all subjective. Sone fictional place are accepte, some Micronation also, but others no?
Please can we stay logical and give to all Micronations the same status instead of tryin to draw a line between good Micronation and not good one or acceptable fictional place and not acceptabl.
Can an admin who collect these kind of coins draw the line, coins and Exonumia don’t follow the same logical. You can’t really pay with a Middle Earth coin.
Applying this logical, all Hutt river coins should be under Australia.
Any news on why this Micronation was rejected when others were accepted?
What is the rule, it look all subjective. Sone fictional place are accepte, some Micronation also, but others no?
Please can we stay logical and give to all Micronations the same status instead of tryin to draw a line between good Micronation and not good one or acceptable fictional place and not acceptabl.
Can an admin who collect these kind of coins draw the line, coins and Exonumia don’t follow the same logical. You can’t really pay with a Middle Earth coin.
Applying this logical, all Hutt river coins should be under Australia.
We need to discuss with other admins, we did not have time yet but soon :-)
@Indomini, we agree to create such issuers as soon as their name look like a country. But the volume of requests being important, would you agree to follow a specific process with Excel sheet?
Please write me in DM to give the instructions :-)
Status changed to Done(Compendium, 8 Sep 2023, 21:12)
This could qualify as a micronation > "Werner Stiefel, an upstate New York pharmaceutical manufacturer, convinced a small gang of eager young libertarians to help him build a ferro-cement boat called "Atlantis II" in 1969. This vessel was supposed to sail down to the Caribbean, where the crew might grab some land in disputed territories such as Anguilla or the Silver Shoals near Haiti, or just use the ship as a staging ground to build some artificial concrete land…"
Just for a bit of information, the information you provided regarding Atlantis are for Atlantis IInotAtlantis as of your source.
The coins of Atlantis we currently have are more related to Esperanto than others thing but still who mint them and why is still not clear:
The current Wikidata of Atlantis is by the way wrong …
