Chhatarpur, Princely state of 1 Rupee - Shah Alam II [solved]

Hi,

The listing for this coin is quite basic

1 Rupee - Shah Alam II - Princely state of Chhatarpur – Numista

I think the date range should be expanded to include regnal years that have been recorded - as per collection of coins shown on Zeno

ZENO.RU - Chhatarpur

I have a specific coin here

#264081 - Chhatarpur, i.n.o. Shah Alam II, AR Rupee, AH 1192/Ry.22 (zeno.ru)

which has the date pairing of AH1192 Ry.22

Another coin

#197546 - Chhatarpur, i.n.o. Shah Alam II, AR Rupee, AH 1212/Ry.25 (zeno.ru)

has the pairing of AH 1212/Ry.25 leading to the suspicion that there is not a well defined or robustly QA'ed pairing .  However the current coins on Zeno do show a reasonably good list of the regnal years recorded which are.

Ry.3

Ry.7

Ry.10

Ry.11

Ry.14

Ry.16

Ry.17

Ry.19

Ry.22

Ry.24

Ry.25

thanks

Please send change requests accordingly and/or send directly a message to the referee if needed, no Admin action is needed here apparently 

Bacchus

Hi,

 

The listing for this coin is quite basic

1 Rupee - Shah Alam II - Princely state of Chhatarpur – Numista

 

I think the date range should be expanded to include regnal years that have been recorded - as per collection of coins shown on Zeno

ZENO.RU - Chhatarpur

 

I have a specific coin here

#264081 - Chhatarpur, i.n.o. Shah Alam II, AR Rupee, AH 1192/Ry.22 (zeno.ru)

which has the date pairing of AH1192 Ry.22

 

Another coin

#197546 - Chhatarpur, i.n.o. Shah Alam II, AR Rupee, AH 1212/Ry.25 (zeno.ru)

has the pairing of AH 1212/Ry.25 leading to the suspicion that there is not a well defined or robustly QA'ed pairing .  However the current coins on Zeno do show a reasonably good list of the regnal years recorded which are.

 

Ry.3

Ry.7

Ry.10

Ry.11

Ry.14

Ry.16

Ry.17

Ry.19

Ry.22

Ry.24

Ry.25

 

thanks

I'd like to point out that you should carefully check the minting quality of your coin, as it could be a copy from the Princely State of Bijawar. I have one engraved with the date "1221" and only the lower part of the regnal year, which is a "2," is visible. The rupee also features several corrupted or exaggeratedly out-of-proportion legends. This one is slightly smaller and thicker than a normal Panna or Chhatarpur rupee.