Suggestion to split Belarus 2009-2022 conslidated banknote types into two separate design types in teh same way as for 100 Rubles [solved]

Hi,

I suggest splitting the following Belarus Numista type entries as they all have two quite distinct banknote typpes within a single type entry which is incorrect (taken into account that even addition of Braille tactile circles usually justifies as a design change requireing a separate Numista banknote type entry on the list). The design changes are mainly for the front of the banknotes.

We now have this in place for Belarus 100 Rubles:

N#211982

N#332450

As you can see above, the design changes on the front are significant:

- “100” denimonation value, different colors

- the castle window is removed for 2022 issue on the left of the obverse

- different security thread

- word inscription below the castle image is added for 2022 issue

- Braille tactile lines are added for 2022 issue

The same also applies for the following face values from the same range of banknotes, all of them are now listed on Numista within single consolidated type entries which is incorrect and we must split them to have both major designs being represented as separate Numista entries.

5 Rubles

N#211973

10 Rubles

N#211978

20 Rubles

N#211980

50 Rubles

N#211981

Please support mu suggestion and spread the word out so that we could do that asap.

Thank you!

Alex

Completely agree. The earlier request also had clear support.

There have been no downvotes for this so can it it please be implemented?

ceh2019

There have been no downvotes for this so can it it please be implemented?

Please create new entries on which transferring collections, and then resubmit a request for deduplication :-)

Requests for 5, 10, 20 and 50 rubleu made. I'll post again once they've been accepted.

ceh2019

Requests for 5, 10, 20 and 50 rubleu made. I'll post again once they've been accepted.

Perfect thanks

Do we really need to add new pages for this? Except the date, what else is different?

It is stated in the above thread:

As you can see above, the design changes on the front are significant:

- “100” denimonation value, different colors

- the castle window is removed for 2022 issue on the left of the obverse

- different security thread

- word inscription below the castle image is added for 2022 issue

- Braille tactile lines are added for 2022 issue

+ please see the posted images for every denomination pair.

I jus want to get this straight once and for all.

You guys want to split these entries because of minor differences, but at the same time you want to merge these entries because the difference is too little? Get your minds straight, folks!

Dear ngdawa, I do not see any contradiction here! Regards, Alex

gebikimame2017

Dear ngdawa, I do not see any contradiction here! Regards, Alex

Same arguments, contradictional solutions. To me it doesn't make sense. It's just messy. Don't make ut messy.

The new pages have been approved. I know the referee isn't happy about this but they deserve our thanks nonetheless. Could owners of the later dates in the pre-existing pages be transfered over and those dates then deleted?

ceh2019

The new pages have been approved. I know the referee isn't happy about this but they deserve our thanks nonetheless. Could owners of the later dates in the pre-existing pages be transfered over and those dates then deleted?

Please link entries of origin and destination

Please move:

2019 dates of N#211973 to N#353522

2019 dates of N#211978 to N#353523

2020 dates of N#211980 to N#353524

2020 dates of N#211981 to N#353525

Thanks.

Done