Costa Rica's coins are difficult to catalogue due to many small changes. I notice that a new page has just appeared for the 2001 5 colones. I assume this was split off from the 1997-1999 coin. The KM# are 227a, 227a.1 and 227a.2, so not much help there. What I'm wondering is whether it would be better to have the 1997 coin in one page and the 1999 and 2001 coins together in a second page? An image of the 1997 coin can be found here. To me, the biggest change is at the bottom of the shield, with the 1999 and 2001 coins more similar to each other than either is to the 1997. Either way, we really need images of all three dates to illustrate properly what's going on. I have the 1997 date, so I can supply a picture if needed.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Yes, that would explain the decision to separate 2001 and is confirmed on the BCCR website. What about splitting 1997 and 1999? If you could slow down the rate of change on your gifs, they'd be a great addition.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Quote: "rsirian1"Per SCWC, KM# 227a and 227a.1 are copper-aluminum-nickel and KM# 227a.2 is brass. That, I'm sure is why they were split.
You've got it! Both Krause and the Central Bank agree that 2001 is Brass and 1997-99 are Copper-Aluminium-Nickel. No changes are needed for the respective pages.
Here's a quick note:
For Costa Rican coins, unless there is a change in the technical details between types (e.g. composition or weight), it is preferable to list them under a single page. About every few years the government ordered coins from different mints, which has resulted in slight variations from one year to the next. Rather than fracturing the coins into several dozen pages and making the catalog unwieldy, it is better to simply note the varieties in the comments.
Master Coin Referee
Coin referee for CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN, and SLV.
Revisor principal de monedas
Revisor de Numista para monedas de CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN y SLV.
It makes it a bit difficult to collect the different varieties through swaps if they're clumped together since I can't select the ones I'm missing without others I've already got. Nevertheless, better pictures will help. Here's my 1997.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Quote: "ceh2019"It makes it a bit difficult to collect the different varieties through swaps if they're clumped together since I can't select the ones I'm missing without others I've already got.
I remember a couple of threads requesting the ability to add individual year-lines to one's wishlist. Perhaps you should look into those requests.
In the meantime, the pages should remain as is.
Master Coin Referee
Coin referee for CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN, and SLV.
Revisor principal de monedas
Revisor de Numista para monedas de CRI, GTM, HND, NIC, PAN y SLV.
As can be seen, in SCWC there is no doubt how to distinguish the different types.
The different years are sufficient. See above. Only two have the same alloy, they differentiate by the smoke of the volcanoes and by the their years and other type sets etc.
As SCWC shows you have 5 types in the km227 family.
In the beginning there was SCWC and then came Numista and things got complicated, because somebody in Numista thought it would be nice to have fewer pages, so REAL km# were merged into "Numista km#" and the real km# were not searchable any longer!
Quote: "Sjoelund"
As can be seen, in SCWC there is no doubt how to distinguish the different types.
The different years are sufficient. See above. Only two have the same alloy, they differentiate by the smoke of the volcanoes and by the their years and other type sets etc.
As SCWC shows you have 5 types in the km227 family.
In the beginning there was SCWC and then came Numista and things got complicated, because somebody in Numista thought it would be nice to have fewer pages, so REAL km# were merged into "Numista km#" and the real km# were not searchable any longer!
Edit: I have them all, and never had any problems entering them in my collection....
Sadly, the request to add individual year lines to wish lists was rejected.
The images showing the differences are essential at the moment as the descriptions, both in SCWC and Numista, miss one of the main differences, which is the shape of the bottom part of the shield, not just the outline and the volcano smoke.
I doubt there are many countries where such a significant difference would be put together in a single type but, if we are going to treat Costa Rica as a special case, let's at least do a decent job of communicating the varieties. I'll request that the above image be added to the comments. I'm afraid I find the animated gif a little hard to focus on.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
If you want to I can make macros of the bottoms of the two coins concerned? BTW, the animated gif does not work at all in coin articles, I tried.... a long time ago!
Result?
I'm sorry to hear the CR was denied, what was the reason, since I certainly can NOT think of one! Try to see, if the above graphic can be entered into the comment sections of all the coins?
The CR to add my image is pending but perhaps your image could be added to all the relevant pages? Regarding adding year lines to wish lists, I can't find the original thread (it was quite a while ago) but I don't remember a reason being given other that it wasn't possible.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Quote: "ceh2019"The CR to add my image is pending but perhaps your image could be added to all the relevant pages? Regarding adding year lines to wish lists, I can't find the original thread (it was quite a while ago) but I don't remember a reason being given other that it wasn't possible.
We know it's possible just ask rsirian1, he knows who to ask, let's see what he says? I'll send him a PM.
I believe ceh2019 is referring to adding specific year/variant lines to "My wishes" wish lists, not modifications of specific year lines on coin pages. The only one that can do that is Xavier and he has said it's hard to do but hasn't rejected it (yet).
This request was rejected but only because it was already being tracked here which is still open with a vote of 51 for/2 against.
I never thought about that as a year long contributor to scwc.... I'll do it differently and just as good. Give me till tomorrow. I'm occupied with Canadian varieties for the moment.
Also, anyone notice that the Numista coin page for KM# 227 says it's brass plated steel, not bronze like in SCWC? I don't have one to check if it's magnetic.
Edit: Just checked the BCCR web site and it confirms it's bronze.
My 1995 is magnetic and brass-coloured. The BCCR website says Acero inoxidable revestido en bronce
which I would translate as Bronze-plated stainless steel
though why you would use stainless steel if you're going to plate it, I'm not sure. Quite what they mean by "bronze" is up for debate.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Hmmm...when I selected the English version of the web site it said "bronze" but the Spanish version has what you said. The magnet doesn't lie, it's plated steel (maybe stainless, maybe not?).
I'd go with the Spanish rather than the English version but there is one error in the Spanish version. The 1995 25 colones is magnetic but listed as brass.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
Ah, yes, I see it now. Except the word "plan" doesn't fit here. Maybe "in background" instead? Or "level"? Also, I'd use "steel" or "SS" instead of Fe.