I know we discussed this a while ago but, whilst the other splits for the half dime, dime and quarter have been initiated, this one is still a single page, despite the switch from a grain weight standard to metric. Apologies if this is already under way, I just wanted to check it hadn't been missed out.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.
I did not create a separate kmA92 page. The only difference is the .01g difference in weight which we both agree is not a real physical change but an act of Congress. Therefore I decided to keep km92 and kmA92 together much like we kept km62.1 and 62.2 together even though they are different km numbers. If you think they should be separated I would be happy to do that. Let me know your thoughts.
I was about to put the counter arguments to this but I now see that the separate page for KM#A92 has been created. If there's still uncertainty about this being correct I can go into more detail.
Former Numista referee for banknotes from Ireland, Northern Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Saint Helena.