Portugal 200 escudos de Orta. Unclear remarks

The article https://en.numista.com/catalogue/pieces1238.html
in Comments gives a documentation
https://en.numista.com/catalogue/images/5d9d9fe172a84.jpg which informs that the dies A and B are in 1997. Unfortunately the documentation hides the images of Obv. for each image of Rev., that is why it is not clear what does it mean:
the left photo is from the coin 1991, the right can be from any year 1992-2001 and the central is of Obv. from 1997.
The correspondence between these 3 photos is not clear.

Question 1: which year the left Rev.?

The mintage section gives:
1997 INCM5 000 000 14% Exist in medal alignment - Exists with trinket hat in outside ring

Note. Obviously the percentage is from wrongly described occurrence of lines and has nothing to do with frequency as it expected to be. This is not the case of this topic and in this post onwards this nonsense will be omitted.

It is not clear where to look at to attribute the 1997 : 'Exists with trinket hat in outside ring' (Fr.: 'Existe avec ponpon dans l'anneau extérieur').

Question 2: How to attribute 1997 "with trinket hat in outside ring"?

I suggest you make your own documentations, then maybe you would be satisfied?

I'm not seeing the problem here. Sjoelund's graphic shows the difference in the reverses while the other graphic shows the obverses. The text above these graphics makes the possible die combinations very clear. It might be nice for all of Numista's graphics to be fully standardized, but that's not going to happen when they're made by volunteers doing a pretty bang up job already.

The only thing that's a bit vague is the year line comment that you pointed out, but if you look at the difference in the position of the peak of the hat on the reverse of Sjoelund's examples it seems pretty clear. If there's a change to be made here it would probably just be to clarify that language.

Good luck!

For the small person from Cyprus, open your eyes and start thinking positively, if that's a term you have heard about.



Which one would you think (if you can think, that is) is with the trinket hat on the outer ring?

Quote: "cyprusalexander"​Note. Obviously the percentage is from wrongly described occurrence of lines and has nothing to do with frequency as it expected to be. This is not the case of this topic and in this post onwards this nonsense will be omitted.

​Do you really can't make any post at all without using the words nonsense/garbage/fake? Obviously not. Just STOP.
And obviously, you still don't understand how the frequency percentages work.

I amended the documentation for the sake of all happy numista members and all positive coin collectors all over the world... my pleasure