Add ruling authority of Tibet [solved]

I'll like to suggest this list for the ruling authorities of the Tibet catalough.
I couldn't really figure out when the split was, between the Guangxu emperor and the 13th Dalai Lama. As I understand it, it was more a gradual change from one to the other.
Tecnicly the Dalai Lamas just had to pay tribute to the Emprors before, but the Emperor is featured on some of the coins and where the defactor rulers of Tibet (and named after the emperors in the Numista catalough).

There may be some mistakes, but I tried my best with the sources belove and the information already provided on Numista. I'm not a historian nor expert in any way, but I hope it may be a help at least.

Tibet Autonomous Region of China:
Qing Dynasty
- Qianlong (1735-1796)
- Jiaqing (1796-1820)
- Gaungxu (1875-1908)
Dalai Lamas
- Thubten Gyatso (13th Dalai Lama) (1879-1933)
- Jamphel Yeshe Gyaltsen (5th Reting Rinpoche) (1934–1941) (Regent)
- Taktra Rinpoche (3rd Taktra Rinpoche) (1941–1950) (Regent)
- Tenzin Gyatso (14th Dalai Lama) (1950-1959)

Main source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_rulers_of_Tibet
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3rd_Taktra_Rinpoche
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_monarchs
https://www.britannica.com/place/Tibet/Tibet-14th-to-19th-century#ref71440
Video from Visual Politic, about Tibet:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qO_PJAzIIo&list=TLPQMTAwNTIwMjHXEtEggiyASg&index=23

Thank you, these were just added.

I just saw this now... and I do not think any of this was actually needed.

The coins that depict the Chinese emperors were made only in the name of those emperors. For other issuers in a similar situation (like the Germanic tribes--take a look at the Gepids, for a specific example), we never added the "In the name of" emperor. I think this makes sense because, often, these emperors can be depicted posthumously, which was indeed the case with Guangxu (depicted on the coins until the 1940s).

And regarding the Dalai Lamas: I know the coins are separated by the Dalai Lamas in Krause; however, there is actually no mention of these rulers on the coins. With that being said, Ganden Phodrang is mentioned on most coins, hence why that was Tibet's one ruling authority.

Although I see Ganden Phodrang is listed as an Emperor... that should be a Period (as that term is for the Tibetan Government and not for a specific person).

So it should stay as it is?

It should be reverted back to how it was before (and with the title for Ganden Phodrang--the only ruling authority needed--changed from Emperor to Period).

My apologies for not seeing this thread sooner--I could have saved you a lot of effort if I did.

As grandma of one of former referees used to say: Do, undo, both is work. Everything is reverted.