I recently just bought some banknotes and the seller sent in a few Mongolian Togrogs (5, 10, and 20) as bonus. While examining them one by one, I found that the 10 and 20 Togrogs (both dated 2014) don't have watermarks.
On the other hand, the 5 Togrogs dated 2008 which come from the same package has the usual Genghis Khan watermark in it. I also have a 20 Togrog dated 2011 which also showed the same watermark. So are the notes mentioned above fake (which is a weird thing to do with small valued note) or the lower-valued Togrogs dated 2014 just don't have watermarks?
Since these are super cheap notes, probably this shouldn't be a big issue.. But I'm just curious.
That's right, every banknote from 1 to 20 togrogs dated 2014 lacks both the watermark and security thread. The only exception is the 10.000 togrog note, probably due to its high denomination.
Status changed to Solved(griff88, 29 Sep 2020, 17:39)
Quote: "aidden"That's right, every banknote from 1 to 20 togrogs dated 2014 lacks both the watermark and security thread. The only exception is the 10.000 togrog note, probably due to its high denomination.
