I totally agree as well.
If I understand correctly, the coins in UNCIRCULATED mint sets are different (better) from just UNCIRCULATED coins. For example in this 2016 set (or any other previous year's set):
http://www.mint.ca/store/coins/2016-uncirculated-set-prod2601157?rcmiid=link|categorypage|2016_Uncirculated_Set|Shop-Circulation_base_&#.Vsf420Au-C0
I just can't take those coins from the packages...
Uncirculated coins in this set are different from the coins taken directly from the mint roll, which are in turn technically never were in circulation either and can be considered uncirculated. That is because description on the RCM site states that coins in a set "have been carefully selected to provide you with the best examples of their kind". But it does not say those coins have UNCIRCULATED FINISH (as it is defined in "A Charlton Standard Catalogue Canadian Coins Volume One, Numismatic Issues, 69th Edition, W.K. Cross: "... slower striking speeds and definitely more care in the loading and unloading of the press. There are few less handling marks than the circulation variety...").
This is the point where I get totally confused about Numista UNC grade. Looks like there is a possibility to have a number of UNC types of coins:
- uncirculated coin with uncirculated finish
- uncirculated coin with circulation finish
- all other finishes (Proof-Like, BU, SP, Proof, Reverse Proof, Bullion, Bullion-SP and Bullion-Proof) could be Circulated or UNC...
... eh, what was I saying....
Gordon Gekko: Now you're not naive enough to think we're living in a democracy, are you buddy? It's the free market.