Hello, I have two coins (a quarter and a cent), which display « ghost » traces. The D on the quarter, the 3 of 1953 on the cent. I read this is caused by grease on the die. Do you think that’s the case here too ? If it’s so, I guess there is no particular bonus value to it. Or is this another case of machine doubling ?
Thanks
Ginger
Si tu cognes ta tête contre une cruche et que ça sonne creux, ce n'est pas forcément la cruche... lollll mon proverbe préféré !
Hi, the brand is MICSCI. It’s a 4.3 ’’ digital microscope. We can snap pictures and even make videos with it, but TF-Card up to 64 G is needed (and sold separatly). I have the same microscope at home. Neither my place of work nor I have the card. That’s why I pictured the screen with my phone.
Si tu cognes ta tête contre une cruche et que ça sonne creux, ce n'est pas forcément la cruche... lollll mon proverbe préféré !
On the cent, I have to question the verdict of machine doubling for three reasons:
1. The ghost 3 is significantly rotated.
2. The ghost 3 is tilted, that is, not level with plane of the coin.
3. No evidence on the 5.
So the question: is it possible for this to occur during mintage? On the other hand with a mintage of nearly 257 million and after 72 years, it highly unlikely you have a new die variety.
Still, it wouldn't hurt to contact the folks at coppercoins.com for an opinion.
Yeah, It's odd. I didn't even notice that. I still labelled it as a machine doubling, and put it for sale. As you said, I don't think I'll ever find a significant varietty that has escaped the eagles eyes of so many collectors and numismatists before. Odds are slim. I might still write to Coppercoins.com. I didn't know them yet. Thank you.
EDIT : I set it aside, I will wait for their opinion…
Si tu cognes ta tête contre une cruche et que ça sonne creux, ce n'est pas forcément la cruche... lollll mon proverbe préféré !