Good day everyone, I'd like to share to you my discoveries. First of all to seek for your expertise and gain knowledge if indeed this variants are legit and may make way to a new discovery. Most of my coin sample here as I noticed appears to bears CAM I have not seen any comments regarding WAM as far as your Numista records is concern.
I made a comparative photo(s) to clear out my concern.
I copied the term used to describe WIDE A M & CLOSE A M variety of the lincoln cents. I just thoughtit would easily describe the difference between the two coins respectively Since it was the difference that i saw on them.
My good sir. I made a research shortly and i found an article regarding my inquiry. It clearly stated there that such variants occured only on PROOF COINS. and though it appears on regular strike coins doesnt render it as an error .its normal. I guess everything is clear now. My appreciation and thanks.
My good sir. I made a research shortly and i found an article regarding my inquiry. It clearly stated there that such variants occured only on PROOF COINS. and though it appears on regular strike coins doesnt render it as an error .its normal. I guess everything is clear now. My appreciation and thanks.
I never heard of this. As far as the article you found, there were no proofs made in 1966 so that doesn't hold up. Proofs in 1989 have an S mint mark not a P mint mark so that too doesn't hold up. Please post the link to the article.
I was skeptical of this finding so I did my own look. I couldn't find any 1989P dimes with wide AM. Please post pictures of the entire coins.
Greetings and salutations, ABBE. So you relied on AI generated content and even switched coins on us. Ouch.
If you think you found a brand new variety on a Roosevelt Dime, you may want to save yourself a whole lot of trouble and see if it's already been recognized on CONECA here: https://www.conecaonline.info/roosevelt-dime
As you'll see on the CONECA link above, there are tons of small varieties for Roosevelt Dimes, but many of them are inconsequential. In other words, you're not going to become a millionaire even if you find one.
After searching the CONECA database if you still think you have found a new variety and you just can't let it go, then try submitting pictures of your coins to CONECA so that they can evaluate it for you. Good luck.
My good Sir, i think there has been a misunderstanding here. First, i submitted a coin with a formal request as i always do since i look up to you all as our experts. For a while, while waiting i decided to make some researches too. I admit i relied on what i read to whether where the source came. Thats why i send a message again that my inquiry is almost answered. Its finished for me. I do intend to stop my inquiry. In the first place, if i have known that other sites can provide me such info perhaps its what i do then . Besides i dont know much yet . But someone among you ask me to kindly send more samples thats why i send them again as a response. A response is a due process . I think my previous messages will clear out things for you my good Sir. Sorry if you felt it that way . its not what i meant when i do inquiry. Have a good day Sir & thank you.
No worries, ABBE. I also was just trying to be helpful in pointing you to some other information that you might find useful. We all started from the beginning at some time and we are all still learning. Have a great day.
I haven't seen a variety on the 1989P/D you've shown. I'd like to see a wide/close AM for the same year/mint to say 1989 has both. Don't compare one year/mint to another. As far as the 1966 as I've already said above, there is both so now take the next step described by TonyCoins. Here are the full pictures from PCGS:
Just to be clear my good Sir, you said you wanted to see both 1989 /D with WAM & CAM ( which i have ) but you also said to take the next step as Sir Tony advices. Which one should i follow? By the way, my apology Sir Tony maybe injust get carried by your choice of word.
Thanks. Maybe, maybe not. That could just be different amounts of die wear, strike pressure, etc. I'm not saying it is or isn't just not as clear cut as this for 1966.
there my good Sir. I have sent them both but not at the same time . Sorry but its the finest shot i can make. It maybe not as clear as pcgs sample shown but i clearly see that theres a real gap between the A & the M on my sample too. Hope to hear your evaluations soon. Thank you again.
well , then i guess its over for now. But im sure you’re somehow made an impression that it truly shows a difference. Only it is not as clear and precise as what the PCGS have. Its fine with me anyway. again, my appreciation ang thanks my good Sir!
With due respect for your time and effort my good Sir, if i may lastly, kindly peep to this 2022/P dime again. I just dont have another coin to compare with but it looks much separated and closely identical to PCGS samples. Again my thanks.
Just to be clear, unless they are from the same year/mint they are meaningless as far as varieties go. Notice how Wide/Close are not even mentioned except for years where both exist?
I just thought that my last sample shows visible gap and only i dont have another same coin to campare with. i see your points but it is with hope that i could find and contribute a new one thats why i keep pushing on , aside from adding to those that already existed. Well, again my appreciation and thanks.
United States • 1 Dime "Roosevelt Dime"
